Gender and number in the nominal domain: An introduction
Abstract
In this introduction, we provide a general overview of the properties of gender and number, two nominal grammatical categories that this special issue is devoted to. Grammatical gender and number have been studied from a variety of theoretical viewpoints and still there is no commonly established and well-defined view on the nature of the two categories. The term ‘gender’ is used for a range of grammatical phenomena, including noun-classification into corresponding inflection classes and syntactically conditioned rules of agreement and concord. Like grammatical gender, grammatical number can be realized through inflection on the noun and/or through the agreement that it triggers on other items. However, unlike grammatical gender, grammatical number has stable, straightforward and systematic interpretive effects, related to the quantity of the predicate denoted by the noun, and hence also of the referent when the nominal expression is referential. Number and gender are core features of nouns and make up or participate in some of the hallmark properties of natural language.Keywords
noun, gender, numberReferences
Acquaviva, P. 2008. Lexical Plurals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acquaviva, P. 2009. Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In A. Galani, D. Redinger & N. Yeo (eds.). York- Essex Morphology Meeting 5: Special Issue of York Working Papers in Linguistics, 1-21. York: University of York.
Alexiadou, A. 2004. Inflection class, gender and DP-internal structure. In G. Müller, L. Gunkel & G. Zifonun (eds.). Explorations in Nominal Inflection, 21-50. Berlin: Mouton.
Arsenijević, B. 2018. Gender, like classifiers, specifies the type of partition: Evidence from Serbo-Croatian. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 52(1): 21-37.
Arsenijević, B. 2020. Adjectives as a lexical category – a story of striving for extension. To appear in: M. Mitrović & P. Panagiotidis (eds.). A°: The Lexical Status of Adjectives. Amsterdam: Jon Benjamins.
Mitić, I. & Arsenijević, B. 2019. Plural conjuncts and syncretism facilitate gender agreement in Serbo-Croatian: experimental evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 10(942): 1-14.
Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borik, O. & Gehrke, B. 2015. An introduction to the syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. In O. Borik & B. Gehrke (eds.). The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation, 1-43. Leiden: Brill.
Borik, O. & Espinal, M.T. 2015. Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions in Spanish: definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review 32(2): 167-225.
Borthen K. 2003. Norwegian Bare Singulars. Ph.D. Dissertation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Carlson, G. 1977/1980. References to kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published by Garland, New York 1980.
Cheng, L. & Sybesma. R. 1999. Bare and Not-So-Bare Nouns and the Structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509-542.
Chierchia, G. 1998. Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339- 405.
Corbett, G.G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, G.G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, G.G. 2007. Gender and Noun Classes. In T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2nd ed., 241-279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dayal, V. 2004. Number marking and indefiniteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393-450.
Dayal, V. 2011. Pseudo incorporation in Hindi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29: 123-167.
Déprez, V. 2005. Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua, 115: 857-883.
Dixon, R.M.W. 1986. Noun classes and noun classification in typological perspective. In C. Craig (ed.). Noun classes and categorization: Proceedings of a symposium on categorization and noun classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983, 105-112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Doron, E. 2003. Bare singular reference to kinds. Proceedings of SALT 13: 73-90. Seattle: University of Washington. In R. B. Young and Y. Zhou (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory XIII, Seattle: University of Washington, 73-90.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. & Pires de Oliveira, R. 2007. Reference to Kinds in Brazilian Portuguese: Bare Singulars vs. Definite Singulars. In Grønn, A. (ed.). Proceedings of SuB12, 107-121. Oslo: ILOS 2008 (ISBN 978-82-92800-00-3).
Espinal, M.T. & McNally, L. 2007. Bare singular nominals and incorporating verbs. In G. Kaiser & M. Leonetti (eds.). Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance languages, 45-62. Arbeitspapier 122, University of Konstanz.
Espinal, M. T. & McNally, L. 2011. Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 47: 87-128.
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. 2010. The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1-54.
Fassi Fehri, A. 2018. Constructing the feminine to mean. Gender, number, numeral, and quantifier extensions in Arabic. New York: Lexington Books.
Fedden, S. & Corbett G.G. 2017. Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1): 1-47.
Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M. & Scontras, G. 2015. The differential representation of number and gender in Spanish. Linguistic Review 32: 703-737.
Van Geenhoven, V. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of West Greenlandic Noun Incorporation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Greenberg, J. H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of language, 73-113. Cambridge, Massachusets, and London, England: MIT Press.
Hachem, M. 2015. Multifunctionality. The internal and external syntax of D- and W-Items in German and Dutch. Utrecht: LOT-Publication.
Harbour, D. 2007. Morphosemantic Number: From Kiowa Noun Classes to UG Number Features. Dordrecht: Springer.
Harbour, D. 2014. Paucity, Abundance and the Theory of Number. Language 90(1): 185-229.
Harris, J. 1991. The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 27-62.
Hockett, C. F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Holt/Rinehart and Winston.
Hudson, R. 1994. About 37% of Word-Tokens are Nouns. Language 70(2): 331-339.
Ionin, T. & Matushansky, O. 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23: 315-360.
Ionin, T. & Matushansky, O. 2018. Cardinals. The Syntax and Semantics of Cardinal-Containing Expressions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Koopman, H. 2003. The locality of agreement and the structure of the DP in Maasai. In W.E. Griffin (ed.). The Role of Agreement in Natural Language: TLS 5 Proceedings, 207-227.
Kramer, R. 2015. The Morphosyntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krifka, M. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. Van Benthem & P. Van Emde Boas (eds.). Semantics and Contextual Expressions, 75-115. Dordrecht: Foris.
Krifka, M. 2004. Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither? In O. Bonami & P. C. Hofherr (eds.). Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, 5: 111-132.
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G., Ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Link, G. 1995. Introduction. In G. Carlson, F. J. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book, 1-124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Landman, F. 2011. Count Nouns – Mass Nouns, Neat Nouns – Mess Nouns. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6: 1-67.
Martí, L. 2020. Numerals and the theory of number. Semantics and Pragmatics 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.13.3
Moravcsik, E. A. 1975. Verb borrowing. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 8: 3-30.
Percus, O. 2011. Gender features and interpretation: a case study. Morphology 21(2): 167-196.
Pesetsky, D. 2013. Russian Case Morphology and the Syntactic Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Picallo, M. C. 1991. Nominals and nominalization in Catalan. Probus 3: 279-316.
Ritter, E. 1993. Where’s gender? Linguistic Inquiry 24: 795-803.
Rothstein, S. 2017. Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sasse, H. J. 2001. Scales between nouniness and verbiness. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.). Language typology and language universals, (HSK 20), 495-509. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Sauerland, U., Anderssen J. & Yatsushiro K. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds.). Linguistic Evidence – Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, 413-434. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sauerland, U. 2008. On the semantic markedness of phi-features. In D. Harbour, D. Adger & S. Béjar (eds.). Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces, 57-82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scontras, G. 2014. The Semantics of Measurement. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Steriopolo, O. & Wiltschko, M. 2010. Distributed GENDER hypothesis. In G. Zybatow et al. (eds). Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Formal Description of Slavic Languages 7.5, 155-172. New York: Peter Lang.
Sudo, Y. & Spathas, G. 2019. Natural Gender and Interpretation in Greek: Comments on Merchant (2014). Ms., UCL, L-ZAS.
Wechsler, S. & Zlatić, L. 2000. A theory of agreement and its application to Serbo-Croatian. Language 76: 799-832.
Yatsushiro, K. & Sauerland, U. 2006. [Feminine] in a high position. Snippets 13: 11-12.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2020 Boban Arsenijević; Olga Borik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
