‘Hot news’ and perfect change: mirativity and the semantics/pragmatics interface
Abstract
This paper proposes an analysis of the hot news Present Perfect (PP) building on Nishiyama & Koenig’s (2010) analysis of the perfect as denoting a perfect state introduced by a variable that needs to be pragmatically enriched. Pragmatic meaning is analysed extending Rett & Murray’s (2013) representation of mirative meaning as the target state of a learning event, which I take to be the speaker’s reaction of surprise more generally. The analysis is considered in the light of noncanonical uses of the PP in Australian English narratives and police media reports. I argue that hot news usage is at the basis of such extensions and propose representations for uses in sequences of clauses expressing temporal progression and in clauses containing a definite past time adverbial. The paper concludes by discussing the present analysis in the light of previous research and its implication to our understanding of the grammaticalization of perfects.Keywords
present perfect, hot news, mirativity, semantic and pragmatic changeReferences
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, London.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Rebecca. 2005. Preterite uses of the present perfect in New Zealand English narratives: a case study. MA Dissertation, University of Canterbury.
de Lancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369-382.
Depraetere, Ilse. 1996. The tense system in English relative clauses: A corpus-based analysis. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Engel, Dulcie & Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2000. The use of the Present Perfect in Australian English.’ Australian Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 119-140.
Fenn, Peter. 1987. A Semantic and Pragmatic Examination of the English Perfect. Tübingen: Narr.
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1989. Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language 13: 1-50.
Fournier, Jean-Marie. 2004. Crise de langue et conscience linguistique: la question de la règle des 24 heures. Dix-septième siècle 223: 251-264.
Glasbey, Sheila R. 2005. A “temporal topic interval” analysis of the English perfect. LAGB Satellite Workshop on Perfectivity and Telicity, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, September 3-4 2005. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~srg/Papers/perfect-paper.pdf
Kiparsky, Paul. 2002. Event structure and the perfect. In Beaver, David I., Casillas Martinez, Luis D., Clark, Brady Z., & Kaufmann, Stefan (eds.). The Construction of Meaning, 113-136. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Klein, Wolfgang. 1992. The present perfect puzzle. Language 68: 525-552.
Klein, Wolfgang. 2000. An analysis of the German Perfekt. Language 76(2): 358-382.
Kamp, Hans & Uwe, Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. An Introduction to Model-Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kamp, Hans, Van Genabith, Josef & Reyle, Uwe. 2011. Discourse representation theory. In Gabbay, Dov & Guenthner, Franz (eds.). Handbook of Philosophical Logic 15, second edition, 124-394. Netherlands: Springer.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More Structural Analogies Between Pronouns and Tenses. In Strolovitch, Devon & Lawson, Aaron (eds.). Proceedings of SALT 8: 92-110. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCawley, James D. 1971. Tense and time reference in English. In Fillmore, Charles & Langendoen, Terence (eds.). Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 96-13. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
McCawley, James D. 1981. Notes on the English present perfect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 81-90.
McCoard, Robert W. 1978. The English Perfect: Tense Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Michaelis, Laura A. 1994. The ambiguity of the English present perfect. Journal of Linguistics 30: 111-157.
Mittwoch, Annita. 2008. The English resultative perfect and its relationship to the experiential perfect and the simple past tense. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 323-351.
Nishiyama, Atsuko & Koenig, Jean-Paul. 2010. What is a perfect state? Language 86(3): 611-646.
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Portner, Paul. 2003. The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 459-510.
Rett, Jessica & Murray, Sarah E. 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT 23: 453-472.
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 411-442.
Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2007. Perfect change: synchrony meets diachrony. In Salmons, Joseph C. & Dubenion-Smith, Shannon. (eds.). Historical Linguistics 2005, 133-147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2010. The perfect crime? Illicit uses of the present perfect in Australian police media releases. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3400-3417.
Ritz, Marie-Eve & Engel, Dulcie. 2008. Vivid narrative use and the present perfect in spoken Australian English. Linguistics 46(1): 131-160.
Schaden, Gerhard, 2008. On the cross-linguistic variation of ‘one-step past referring’ tenses. In Grønn, Atle (ed.). Proceedings of SuB12. Oslo: ILOS 2008.
Schwenter, Scott A. 1994. “Hot news” and the grammaticalization of perfects. Linguistics 32: 995-1028.
Schwenter, Scott & Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2008. Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: the ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change 20(1): 1-39.
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2018 Marie-Eve Ritz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
