A semantic approach to auxiliary selection with German verbs of motion. An empirical study
Abstract
German manner-of-motion verbs can take both haben ‘have’ and sein ‘be’ as perfect auxiliaries. It has recently been proposed that, in these cases, auxiliary selection is determined by the feature [locomotion], where [+locomotion] triggers sein ‘be’ and [-locomotion] triggers haben ‘have’ (Randall 2007). In this paper, we explore the notion of locomotion from an empirical semantic perspective. We report the results of an acceptability judgment task and we show that some manner-of-motion verbs are more typically associated with [+locomotion] than others depending on the prominence of directionality involved in verb semantics. However, we argue that locomotion is not a property of verbs themselves but rather a property of constructions (Goldberg 1995), which impose a specific semantic construal on the verbs.Keywords
auxiliary selection, German, manner-of-motion verbs, semantics, locomotionReferences
Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1-14.
Beavers, John; Levin, Beth & Tham, Shiao Wei. 2010. The Typology of Motion Expressions Revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(2): 331-377.
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Demonte, Violeta. 2011. Los eventos de movimiento en español: construcción léxico-sintáctica y microparámetros preposicionales. In Cuartero Otal, Juan; García Fernández, Luis & Sinner, Carsten (eds.). Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto, 16-42. München: Peniope.
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2013. Auxiliary selection in German: Constructional gradience with perfect formation. In van Gelderen, Elly; Cennamo, Michela & Barðdal, Jóhanna (eds.). Argument Structure in Flux, 405-434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fábregas, Antonio. 2007. An exhaustive lexicalisation account of directional complements. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics 34(2): 165-199.
Folli, Raffaella & Gillian Ramchand. 2005. Prepositions and Results in Italian and English: An Analysis from Event Decomposition. In Verkuyl, Henk; de Swart, Henriette & Angeliek van Hout (eds.). Perspectives on Aspect, 81-105. Dodrecht: Kluwer.
Gillmann, Melitta. 2011. Die Grammatikalisierung des sein-Perfekts. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) 133(2): 203-234.
Gillmann, Melitta. 2015. Auxiliary selection in closely related languages. The case of German and Dutch. In Kailuweit, Rolf & Rosemeyer, Malte (eds.). Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness, 333-358. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hoekstra, Teun. 1999. Auxiliary selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 67-84.
Keller, Frank & Sorace, Antonella. 2003. Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German. Journal of Linguistics 39(1): 57-108.
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Legendre, Géraldine. 2007. On the typology of auxiliary selection. Lingua 117: 1522-1540.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Class and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewandowski Wojciech & Mateu, Jaume. 2016. Thinking for translating and intra-typological variation in satellite-framed languages. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14(1): 185-208.
Mateu, Jaume & Massanell, Mar. 2015. A constructional approach to auxiliary selection: Evidence from existential constructions. In Kailuweit, Rolf & Rosemeyer, Malte (eds.). Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness, 183-212. Berlin: De Gruyter.
McFadden, Thomas. 2007. Auxiliary selection. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(6): 674-708.
Naigles, Letitia & Paula Terrazas. 1998. Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science 9(5): 363-369.
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157-189.
Randall, Janet. 2007. Parameterized auxiliary selection. A fine-grained interaction of features and linking rules. In Aranovich, Raúl (ed.). Split Auxiliary Systems. A Cross- Linguistic Perspective, 207-235. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2014. Auxiliary Selection in Spanish. Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sapp, Christopher. 2011. Auxiliary selection in the Early New High German perfect tenses. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 53(2): 29-43.
Seibert, Anja (1993). Intransitive constructions in German and the ergative hypothesis. Working Papers in Linguistics 14. University of Trondheim.
Slobin, Dan, & Hoiting, Nini. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487-505.
Smith, Carlota. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Son, Minjeong. 2007. Directionality and Resultativity: The Cross-linguistic Correlation Revisited, Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics 34(2): 126-164.
Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76: 859-890.
Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: a typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480-519.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol.1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
van Hout, Angeliek. 2004. Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In Alexiadou, Artemis; Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Everaert, Martin (eds.). The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, 60-83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wermke, Matthias; Kunkel-Razum, Kathrin & Scholze-Stubenrecht, Werner. 2016. Duden. Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Zaenen, Annie. 2011. Unaccusativity in Dutch. Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In Pustejovsky, James (ed.). Semantics and the Lexicon, 129-161. Dordrecht, London: Springer.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2018 Wojciech Lewandowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
