Universal semantic features and the typology of cardinal numerals

Marcin Wągiel, Pavel Caha

Abstract

The paper proposes a unified morpho-semantic account for the typological variation in the form and meaning of cardinal numerals. In particular, we investigate the morphological marking of two different types of cardinals and argue that it is possible to identify cross-linguistically stable semantic ingredients, which compositionally provide the attested types of numerals. We adopt the framework of Nanosyntax (Starke 2009 et seq.) as a model of morphology which, when applied to the semantic structures we propose, delivers the relevant marking patterns. The model we develop is broadly based on the idea that the meaning components are uniformly structured across languages, and they must all be pronounced, though languages differ in how they pronounce them. All cardinals share an underlying scale of natural numbers but differ in the number of operations subsequently applied to that scale.

Keywords

numerals; portmanteau; classifiers; nanosyntax

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arsenijević, B. 2016. Gender as a grammaticalized classifier system: The case of the Serbo-Croatian neuter. Unpublished manuscript available on LingBuzz: lingbuzz/002848.

Bale, A. & Coon, J. 2014. Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: Consequences for the mass/count distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4): 695-707.

Baunaz, L. & Lander, E. 2018. Nanosyntax: The basics. In L. Baunaz, K. De Clercq, L. Haegeman & E. Lander (eds.). Exploring Nanosyntax, 3-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borg, A. J. 1988. To be or not to be a copula in Maltese? Journal of Maltese Linguistics 17(18): 54-71.

Borg, A. 1974. Maltese numerals. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 124(2): 291-305.

Bultinck, B. 2005. Numerous Meanings: The Meaning of English Cardinals and the Legacy of Paul Grice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Bylinina, L. & Nouwen, R. 2018. On “zero” and semantic plurality. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1)/98: 1-23.

Caha, P. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. University of Tromsø.

Caha, P., De Clercq, K. & Vanden Wyngaerd, G. 2019. The fine structure of the comparative. Studia Linguistica 73(3): 470-521.

Chierchia, G. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (ed.). Events and Grammar, 53-103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Chierchia, G. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174(1): 99-149.

Chirikba, V. 2003. Abkhaz. Muenchen: Lincom.

Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133-166. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cinque, G. & Krapova, I. 2007. A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. In G. Alboiu, A. A. Avram, L. Avram & D. Isac (eds.). Pitar Moş: A Building with a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, 45-51. Bucharest: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.

Corver, N. & Zwarts, J. 2006. Prepositional numerals. Lingua 116(6): 811-836.

Dékány, É. & Csirmaz, A. 2017. Numerals and quantifiers. In G. Alberti & T. Laczkó (eds.). Syntax of Hungarian: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Comprehensive Grammar Resources, 1044-1150. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Denney, J. P. & Odjig, L. 1973. The meaning of ninkotw ‘one’ and pešikw ‘one’ in Ojibway. International Journal of American Linguistics 39(2): 95-97.

Fassi Fehri, A. 2018. Constructing Feminine to Mean: Gender, Number, Numeral, and Quantifier Extensions in Arabic. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Greenberg, J. H. 1978. Generalizations about numeral systems. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (eds.). Universals of Human Language, vol. 3: Word Structure, 249-295. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Haida, A. & Trinh, T. 2019. A more inclusive theory of numerals. Paper presented at the 12th conference on Syntax, Phonology and Language Analysis (SinFonIJA 12), Masaryk University in Brno.

Hewitt, G. 2010. Abkhaz: A Comprehensive Self-Tutor. Muenchen: Lincom.

Horn, L. R. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of the Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. University of California.

Horn, L. R. 1992. The said and the unsaid. In C. Barker & D. Dowty (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2, 163-192. Columbus: Ohio State University.

Hurford, J. R. 1998. The interaction between numerals and nouns. In F. Plank (ed.). Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe, 561-620. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hurford, J. R. 2001. Languages treat 1–4 specially. Mind & Language 16(1): 69-75.

Ionin, T. & Matushansky, O. 2018. Cardinals: The Syntax and Semantics of Cardinal-Containing Expressions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kiparsky, P. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 93-106. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Krifka, M. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem & P. von Emde Boas (eds.). Semantics and Contextual Expression, 75-115. Dordrecht: Foris.

Krifka, M. 1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book, 398-411. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Li, X. P. 2011. On the Semantics of Classifiers in Chinese. Ph.D. Bar-Ilan University.

Link, G. 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass nouns: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds.). Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, 302-323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Malau, C. 2016. A Grammar of Vurës, Vanuatu. Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

Murphy, A. 2018. Pronominal inflection and NP ellipsis in German. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 21: 327-379.

Nouwen, R. 2008. Directionality in numeral quantifiers: The case of up to. In T. Friedman & S. Ito (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 18, 569-582. Ithaca: Cornell University.

Nouwen, R. 2010. Two kinds of modified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1-41.

Nouwen, R. 2016. Making sense of the spatial metaphor for number in natural language. Unpublished manuscript available on LingBuzz: lingbuzz/003100.

Obikudo, E. F. 2016. Counting: The Ịḅanị way. In O. Ndimele & E. S. L. Chan (eds.). The Numeral Systems of Nigerian Languages, 217-223. Port Harcourt: M&J Grand Orbit Communications.

Qi, J. & He, C. 2019. The morphosyntax of numerals ʥi33/ʥĩ35 ‘one’ in Shuhi and implications for the semantics of numerals. Lingua 225: 63-80.

Rothstein, S. 2010. Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3): 343-397.

Rothstein, S. 2013. A Fregean semantics for number words. In M. Aloni, M. Franke & F. Roelofsen (eds.). Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 179-186. Amsterdam: ILLC.

Rothstein, S. 2017. Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sadock, J. 1984. Whither radical pragmatics? In D. Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, 139-149. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Schnell, S. 2011. A Grammar of Vera’a: An Oceanic Language of North Vanuatu. Kiel: Kiel University.

Scontras, G. 2013. Accounting for counting: A unified semantics for measure terms and classifiers. In T. Snider (ed.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 23, 549-569. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

Starke, M. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36(1): 1-6.

Starke, M. 2018. Complex left branches, spellout, and prefixes. In L. Baunaz, K. De Clercq, L. Haegeman & E. Lander (eds.). Exploring Nanosyntax, 239-249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sudo, Y. 2016. The semantic role of classifiers in Japanese. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 11(1): 1-15.

Vanden Wyngaerd, G., Starke, M., De Clercq, K. & Caha, P. 2020. How to be positive. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1)/23: 1-34.

Watanabe, A. 2017. Natural language and set-theoretic conception of natural number. Acta Linguistica Academica 64(1): 125-151.

Wągiel, M. 2018. Subatomic Quantification. Ph.D. Masaryk University in Brno.

Wągiel, M. to appear. Grammatical gender meets classifier semantics: Evidence from Slavic numerals. In V.

Gribanova, S. Grimberg, E. Petersen O Farrill, E. Portelance & B. Waldon (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Copyright (c) 2020 Marcin Wągiel, Pavel Caha