Diminutives: Exceptions to Harmonic Uniformity

Péter Rebrus, Péter Szigetvári

Abstract

Front-back harmony in Hungarian is governed by the root of words: it disregards suffixes in most cases. That is, a back-vowelled root (B) followed by any number of neutral-vowelled suffixes (N) will take a back-vowelled suffix (B+N+N+B), but a root with a back vowel followed by several neutral vowels is possibly followed by a front-vowelled suffix (F): BNN+F/B. We call this Harmonic Uniformity. This is respected even in truncated stems: NB→N<B>+N+B, although NN stems practically never take a back suffix (NN+F). Diminutive forms are the only exceptions to this pattern. We claim that this is so, because diminutive forms are much more loosely related to their “base” than is the case with any other types of suffixation.

Keywords

morphology; vowel harmony; Hungarian; diminutives; truncation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alber, Birgit & Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2012. Templatic and subtractive truncation. In Jochen Trommer (ed.). The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, 289-325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benua, Laura. 1995. Identity effects in morphological truncation. In Beckman, Jill, Urbanczyk, Susan & Dickey, Laura Walsh (eds.). Papers in Optimality Theory, 77-136. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18.

Blaho, Sylvia & Szeredi, Dániel. 2013. Hungarian neutral vowels: A microcomparison. Nordlyd 40(1): 20-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/12.2499

Forró, Orsolya. 2012. Ingadozás a magyar elölségi harmóniában: Szempontok a variabilitás szinkróniájának és diakróniájának feltárásához és értelmezéséhez. Doctoral dissertation, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Piliscsaba.

Hayes, Bruce & Londe, Zsuzsa Cziráky. 2006. Stochastic phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23: 59-104.

Kiefer, Ferenc & Ladányi, Mária. 2000. A szóképzés. In Kiefer, Ferenc (ed.). Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3: Morfológia, 137-164. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Kontra, Miklós & Ringen, Catherine. 1986. Hungarian vowel harmony: The evidence from loanwords. Ural-Altaic Yearbook 58: 1-14.

Patay, Fanni Zsófia. 2015. Reduplikációs típusok és mintázatok: A magyar ikerszók optimalitáselméleti elemzése. BA thesis, Theoretical Linguistics Programme, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.

Rebrus, Péter. 2000. Morfofonológiai jelenségek. In Kiefer, Ferenc (ed.). Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3: Morfológia, 763-947. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Rebrus, Péter. 2005. Hogyan inflektál a magyar? In Gervain, Judit, Kovács, Kristóf, Lukács, Ágnes, & Racsmány, Mihály (eds.). Az ezerarcú elme, 56-67. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Rebrus, Péter & Törkenczy, Miklós. 2015. Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 41(1-2): 1-61.

Siptár, Péter & Törkenczy, Miklós. 2000. The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sóskuthy, Márton. 2012. Morphology in the extreme: Echo-pairs in Hungarian. In Kiefer, Ferenc & Bánréti, Zoltán (eds.). Twenty years of theoretical linguistics in Budapest, 123-143. Budapest: Tinta.

Törkenczy, Miklós. 2011. Hungarian Vowel Harmony. In Oostendorp, Marc van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Volume V, 2963-2989. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Törkenczy, Miklós, Szigetvári, Péter & Rebrus, Péter. 2013. Harmony that cannot be represented. In Brandtler, Johan, Molnár, Valéria & Platzack, Christer (eds.). Approaches to Hungarian, 229-252. Volume 13: Papers from the 2011 Lund conference. John Benjamins.

van de Weijer, Jeroen. 1989. The formation of diminutive names in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 39: 353-371.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Copyright (c) 2016 Péter Rebrus, Péter Szigetvári