Exceptional nasal-stop inventories
Abstract
This article explores the topic of exceptionality in phonology focusing on nasal-stop inventories. A meticulous survey shows that it is normal for such systems to include at least two anterior units: /m/ and /n/. The finding that the introduction of /ŋ/, the first posterior unit to appear, normally follows that of both anterior units suggests that anteriority is somehow more compatible with this consonant class; however, this hypothesis is challenged by exceptions: /n/ is occasionally superseded by /ŋ/. The proposed analysis overturns the view that there is a single universal place hierarchy. It demonstrates that languages assess the cost of place features on multiple dimensions and that nasal-stop inventories are shaped by the conflict between three evaluation measures: one for articulatory cost, one for perceptual cost, and one for dispersion. A theory of far greater explanatory power emerges when each evaluation measure is empirically substantiated and their universality is strictly respected.Keywords
sound inventories, nasal stops, place features, exceptions, place hierarchies, universal rankings, articulatory cost, perceptual cost, dispersionReferences
Basbøll, Hans. 1985. Review of Patterns of sounds by Ian Maddieson. Phonology Yearbook 2: 343-353.
Boersma, Paul. 1997. Inventories in Functional Phonology. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21: 59-90. [Rutgers Optimality Archive 232, http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html].
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. The Hague: Holland Academic Press.
Borzone de Manrique, Ana María and Ángela Signorini. 1983. Segmental duration and rhythm in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 11: 117-128.
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blevins, Juliette. 2007. A Long Lost Sister of Proto-Austronesian?: Proto-Ongan, Mother of Jarawa and Onge of the Andaman Islands. Oceanic Linguistics 46.1: 154-98.
Blevins, Juliette. 2009. Another universal bites the dust: Northwest Mekeo lacks coronal phonemes. Oceanic Linguistics 48: 264-273.
Byrd, Dani. 1992. Perception of Assimilation in Consonant Clusters: A Gestural Model. Phonetica 49: 1-24.
Clements, George N. 2009. The role of features in phonological inventories. In E. Raimy, and C. Cairns (eds.). Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology, 19-68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cooper, Franklin S., Pierre C. Delattre, Alvin M. Liberman, John M. Borst, and Louis J. Gerstman. 1952. Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 24: 597-606.
de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The formal expression of scales. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
de Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness. Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delattre, Pierre C. 1958. Acoustic cues in speech: First report. Phonetica 2: 108-118.
Dukiewicz, Leokadia. 1967. Polskie gloski nosowe. Warsaw: Polska Akademia Nauk.
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkley: University of California Press.
Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton.
Ferguson, Charles A. 1974. Universals of nasality. Working Papers on Language Universals 14: 1-16.
Ferguson, Charles A. 1975. Universal tendencies and ‘normal’ nasility. In C. Ferguson, L. Hyman, and J. Ohala (eds.). Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization, 175-196. Stanford, California: Language Universals Project, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.
Flemming, Edward. 1995. Audio representations in phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Flemming, Edward. 1996. Evidence for constraints on contrast: The dispersion theory of contrast. UCLA Working Papers in Phonology 1: 86-106.
Flemming, Edward. 2002. Auditory Representations in Phonology. New York: Routledge.
Flemming, Edward. 2004a. Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In B. Hayes, R. M. Kirchner, and D. Steriade (eds.). Phonetically Bases of Markedness, 232-276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flemming, Edward. 2004b. Speech Perception and Phonological Contrast. In D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez (eds.). The Handbook of Speech Perception, 156-182. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Flemming, Edward. 2006. The role of distinctiveness constraints in phonology. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Foley, William A. 1975. Some rules involving nasals and their implications. In C. Ferguson, L. Hyman, and J. Ohala (eds.). Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization, 213-230. Stanford, California: Language Universals Project, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.
Fujimura, Osamu. 1962a. Analysis of nasal consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34: 1865-75.
Fujimura, Osamu. 1962b. Formant-Antiformant structure of Nasal Murmurs. In Proceedings of the Speech Communication Seminar, Vol 1, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan,1-9. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Speech Transmission Laboratory.
Gubrynowicz, R., L. Le Guennec, and G. Mercier. 1985. Detection and recognition of nasal consonants in continuous speech: Preliminary results. In R. De Mori and C. Suen (eds.). New Systems and Architectures for Automatic Speech Recognition, 613-28. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
House, Arthur S. 1957. Analog studies of nasal consonants. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 22: 190-204.
Hudgins, C. V., and R. H. Stetson. 1937. Relative speed of articulatory movements. Archives néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale 13: 85-94.
Hyman, Larry M. 2008. Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25: 83-137.
Klatt, Dennis H. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 59: 1208-1221.
Kuehn, David P., and Kenneth L. Moll. 1976. A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. Journal of Phonetics 4: 303-320.
Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Liberman, Alvin M., Pierre C. Delattre, Franklin S. Cooper, and Louis J. Gerstman. 1954. The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs 68.
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maddieson, Ian and Kristin Precoda. 1990. Updating UPSID. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74: 104-111.
Malécot, André. 1956. Acoustic cues for nasal consonants: An experimental study involving a tape-splicing technique. Language 32: 274-284
Narayan, Chandan Raghava. 2006. Acoustic-perceptual salience and developmental speech perception. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
Ohala, John J. 1975. Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In C. Ferguson, L. Hyman, and J. Ohala (eds.). Nasalfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization, 289-316. Stanford, California: Language Universals Project, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.
Ohala, John J and Manjari Ohala. 1993. The phonetics of nasal phonology: theorems and data. In M. Huffman and R. Krakow (eds.). Phonetics and Phonology: Vol. 5, nasals, nasalization, and the velum, 225-249. San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc.
Pagliuca, William and Revere D. Perkins. 1986. Review of Patterns of sounds. Lingua 70: 365-378.
Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993.[2004] Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Colorado: Reuters University and University of Boulder. Revised version published by Blackwell, 2004.
Recasens, Daniel. 1983. Place cues for nasal consonants with special reference to Catalan. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73: 1346-1353.
Recasens, Daniel. 1992. Phonology, and speech production and perception: The case of nasal stops. In W. Dressler, H. Luschützky, O. Pfeiffer, and J. Rennison (eds.). Phonologica 1988, 229-238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, Keren and Peter Avery. 1993. Segmental complexities and the Structure of Inventories. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 135-153.
Roon, Kevin, Adamantios I. Gafos, Philip Hoole, and Chakir Zeroual. 2007. Influence of Articulator and Manner Stiffness. In J. Trouvain and W. Barry (eds.). Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 409-412. Saarbruecken, Germany.
Simpson, Adrian P. 1999. Fundamental problems in comparative phonetics and phonology: does UPSID help to solve them? Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1: 349-352.
Vaux, Bert. 2009. The role of features in a symbolic theory of phonology. In Eric Raimy, and Charles E. Cairns (eds.). Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology, 75-97. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2016 Eduardo Piñeros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
