Towards Matrix Syntax
AbstractMatrix syntax is a model of syntactic relations in language, which grew out of a desire to understand chains. The purpose of this paper is to explain its basic ideas to a linguistics audience, without entering into too many formal details (for which cf. Orús et al. 2017). The resulting mathematical structure resembles some aspects of quantum mechanics and is well-suited to describe linguistic chains. In particular, sentences are naturally modeled as vectors in a Hilbert space with a tensor product structure, built from 2x2 matrices belonging to some specific group. Curiously, the matrices the system employs are simple extensions of customary representations of the major parts of speech, as [±N, ±V] objects.
Keywordssyntax, chains, minimalist program, Hilbert space, matrix
Aerts, D. & Aerts, S. 1994. Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Foundations of Science 1: 85-97.
Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H. & Walach, H. (2002). Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics 32: 379-406.
Bruza, P., K. Kitto, D. Nelson & C. McEvoy. 2009. Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon? Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53: 363-377.
Collins, C. & E. Stabler. 2016. A Formalization of Minimalist Syntax. Syntax 19(1): 43-78.
Chomsky, N. 1974. The Amherst Lectures, delivered at the 1974 Linguistic Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst: Université de Paris VII.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gerth, S. & P. beim Graben. 2009. Unifying syntactic theory and sentence processing difficulty through a connectionist minimalist parser. Cognitive Neurodynamics 3: 297-316.
Guimarães, M. 2000. In Defense of Vacuous Projections in Bare Phrase Structure. In Guimarães, M., L. Meroni, C. Rodrigues & I. San Martin (eds.). University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 90-115.
Heunen, C., M. Sadrzadeh & E. Grefenstette (eds.). 2013. Quantum Physics and Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hornstein, N. 1998. Movement and Chains. Syntax 1(2): 99-127.
Hornstein, N. 2001. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kayne, R. 2009. Antisymmetry and the Lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2008: 1-32.
Khrennikov, A. 2006. Quantum-like brain: ‘Interference of minds’. Biosystems 84(3): 225-241.
Martin, R. & J. Uriagereka. 2008. Competence for preferences. In X. Artiagoitia & J. A. Lakarra (eds.). Festschrift for Patxi Goenaga. University of the Basque Country.
Martin, R. & J. Uriagereka. 2014. Chains in Minimalism. In P. Kosta, S. Franks, T. Radeva-Bork & L. Schürcks (eds.). Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Orús, R. & Martin, R. & Uriagereka, J. 2017. Mathematical foundations of matrix syntax. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.00372
Smolensky, P. 1990. Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist networks. Artificial Intelligence 46: 159-216.
Smolensky, P. & G. Legendre. 2006. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to Optimality-Theoretic grammar (vols. 1-2). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J. 2008. Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2019 Roger Martin; Román Orús; Juan Uriagereka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.