Some Puzzling Foundational Issues: The Reading Program
Abstract
This is an annotated transcription of Noam Chomsky’s keynote presentation at the University of Reading, in May 2017. Here, Chomsky reviews some foundational aspects of the theory of structure building: essentially, Merge and Label. The aim is to eliminate what he refers to as extensions of Merge which are seemingly incompatible with the Strong Minimalist Thesis while still accounting for recursive structure, displacement, and reconstruction (as the main empirical goals of the Minimalist Program). These include sidewards movement, multi-dominance, and late- Merge; all of which have been developed throughout the life cycle of transformational generative grammar. Furthermore, Chomsky formulates a series of conditions that an adequate formulation of Merge must meet, and sketches how the aforementioned extensions may violate these conditions. Chomsky arrives at a formulation of an operation MERGE, which maintains the core properties of Merge but is further restricted by limitations over what MERGE can do to the workspaces where syntactic operations apply.Keywords
Strong Minimalist Thesis, workspaces, MERGE, recursionReferences
Anderson, Stephen R. 1969. West Scandinavian Vowel Systems and the Ordering of Phonological Rules. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Berwick, Robert. 1985. The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Borer, Hagit. 2005a. In Name Only. Structuring Sense, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit. 2005b. The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit. 2017. The Generative Word. In James McGilvray (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. 2nd Ed. Cambridge: CUP, 110-133.
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Mimeographed, MIT. Available at http://alpha-leonis.lids.mit.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/chomsky_LSLT55.pdf
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars. Information and Control 2: 137-167.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step – Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 89-155.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Three Factors in Language Design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1-22.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of Projection. Lingua 130: 33-49.
Chomsky, Noam. 2015a. Problems of Projection: Extensions. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.). Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-16.
Chomsky, Noam. 2015b. The Sophia Lectures. Sophia Linguistica 64. Sophia University, Tokyo.
Citko, Barbara. 2005. On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 475-496.
Collins, Chris. 2017. Merge(X, Y) = {X, Y}. In Leah Bauke & Andreas Blühmel (eds.). Labels and Roots. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 47-68.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Springer Verlag.
Epstein, Samuel D., Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely. 2014. Labeling by Minimal Search: Implications for Successive-Cyclic, A-Movement and the Conception of the Postulate “Phase”. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3): 463-481.
Epstein, Samuel D., Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely. 2015. Simplest Merge Generates Set Intersection: Implications for Complementizer-Trace Explanation. In Samuel Epstein, Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely. Explorations in Maximizing Syntactic Minimization. New York: Routledge, 175-194.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Fodor, Jerry A. 2008. LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1): 63-96.
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Greibach, Sheila. 1965. A New Normal-Form Theorem for Context-Free Phrase Structure Grammars. Journal of the ACM 12(1): 42-52.
Halle, Morris & Noam Chomsky. 1960. The morphophonemics of English. MIT RLE Quarterly Progress Report 58: 275-281.
Huybregts, M. A. C. (Riny). 2017. Phonemic clicks and the mapping asymmetry: How language emerged and speech developed. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 81: 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.041
Katz, Jerry & Paul Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in Phonology. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.). Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 93-106.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1964. Classes of languages and Linear-Bounded Automata. Information and Control 7: 207-223.
Lakoff, George. 1965. On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Lakoff, George. 1968. Instrumental Adverbs and the Concept of Deep Structure. Foundations of Language 4(1): 4-29.
Lakoff, George. 1971. On Generative Semantics. In Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.). Semantics - An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, Anthropology and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George & John Robert Ross. 1967 [1976]. Is Deep Structure Necessary? Personal letter to Arnold Zwicky, printed in James D. McCawley (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground. New York: Academic Press, 159-164.
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 235-289.
Lasnik, Howard & Juan Uriagereka. 2005. A course in Minimalist Syntax. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Ph.D. dis¬sertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lees, Robert. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Levine, Robert D. 1985. Right node (non-)raising. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 492-497.
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds.). Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium, UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 201-225.
McCawley, James D. 1968. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. CLS 4: 71-80. Cited by the reprint in McCawley. 1973. Grammar and Meaning. Tokyo: Taishukan, 155-166.
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1): 91-106.
Morin, Yves-Charles & Michael O’Malley. 1969. Multi-rooted vines in semantic rep¬resentation. In Robert Binnick et al. (eds.). Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago, 178-185.
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sidewards Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Peters, Stanley & R. W. Richie. 1981. Phrase Linking Grammars. Ms. Stanford University and Palo Alto, California.
Post, Emil. 1943. Formal Reductions of the General Combinatorial Decision Problem. American Journal of Mathematics 65(2): 197-215.
Post, Emil. 1944. Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 50: 284-316.
Postal, Paul M. 1964. Constituent Structure. Bloomington, Indiana: University of Bloomington.
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Rosenbaum, Peter. 1965. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Saddy, Douglas. 1990. Investigations into Grammatical Knowledge. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Saddy, Douglas. 1991. Wh-scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia. MITWPL #15 ed. Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Hamida Demirdache, 183-218.
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1975. The Single Mother Condition. Journal of Linguistics 11(1): 1-11.
Stepanov, Arthur. 2001. Late adjunction and Minimalist Phrase structure. Syntax 4(2): 94-125.
Turing, Alan M. 1952. The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 237(641): 37-72.
von Neumann, Johann. 1923. Zur Einführung der transfiniten Zahlen. Acta litterarum ac scientiarum Ragiae Universitatis Hungaricae Francisco-Josephinae, Sectio sci¬entiarum mathematicarum 1: 199-208.
Yang, Charles. 2016. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How children learn and break rules of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2019 Noam Chomsky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
